Meyvn Ramblings

Our Decline

2011-06-24T07:14:00.000-04:00

http://video.foxbusiness.com/v/1018058943001/rome-wasnt-destroyed-in-a-day/?playlist_id=87073

Sound familiar?

Soebarkah

2011-06-17T12:05:00.005-04:00

Look Soebarkah.

Hillarious!

2011-06-17T07:26:00.001-04:00

The punk had it coming. Many others deserved worse.

hahahaha.

Bingo!

2011-05-23T21:48:00.001-04:00

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ePZGWvwvH_0&feature=share

Our Problem.

2011-04-26T21:11:00.000-04:00

Some people have the vocabulary to sum up things in a way you can understand them. This quote came from the Czech Republic . Someone over there has it figured out. We have a lot of work to do.

"The danger to America is not Barack Obama but a citizenry capable of entrusting a man like him with the Presidency. It will be far easier to limit and undo the follies of an Obama presidency than to restore the necessary common sense and good judgment to a depraved electorate willing to have such a man for their president. The problem is much deeper and far more serious than Mr. Obama, who is a mere symptom of what ails America . Blaming the prince of the fools should not blind anyone to the vast confederacy of fools that made him their prince. The Republic can survive a Barack Obama, who is, after all, merely a fool. It is less likely to survive a multitude of fools such as those who made him their president.

I happen to agree with this Czech.

What Obama has to say about his origin of birth.

2011-04-15T14:54:00.000-04:00

Watch it before it’s pulled!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MwhKuunp8D8&feature=player_embedded

For The Criminal, Obama.

2011-04-12T20:59:00.000-04:00

Bruce Fein
April 8, 2011

I.
THE IMPEACHMENT POWER

1. Article II, Section IV of the United States Constitution provides: “The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.”

2. According to James Madison’s Records of the Convention, 2:550; Madison, 8 Sept., Mr. George Mason objected to an initial proposal to confine impeachable offenses to treason or bribery:

Why is the provision restrained to Treason & bribery only? Treason as defined in the Constitution will not reach many great and dangerous offences. Hastings is not guilty of Treason. Attempts to subvert the Constitution may not be Treason as above defined–As bills of attainder which have saved the British Constitution are forbidden, it is the more necessary to extend: the power of impeachments.

3. Delegates to the Federal Convention voted overwhelmingly to include “high crimes and misdemeanors” in Article II, Section IV of the United States Constitution specifically to ensure that “attempts to subvert the Constitution” would fall within the universe of impeachable offences. Id.

4. Alexander Hamilton, a delegate to the Federal Convention, characterized impeachable offenses in Federalist 65 as, “offenses which proceed from the misconduct of public men, or in other words, from the violation or abuse of some public trust. They are of a nature which with peculiar propriety may be denominated political, as they relate chiefly to injuries done to society itself.”

5. In 1974, the House Judiciary Committee voted three articles of impeachment against then President Richard M. Nixon for actions “subversive of constitutional government.”

6. Father of the Constitution, James Madison, observed that, “Of all the enemies of public liberty, war is, perhaps, the most to be dreaded, because it comprises and develops the germ of every other…. War is the true nurse of executive aggrandizement.”

7. James Madison also instructed that “no nation could preserve its freedom in the midst of continual warfare.”

8. The exclusive congressional power to commence war under Article I, section VIII, clause XI of the Constitution is the pillar of the Republic and the greatest constitutional guarantor of individual liberty, transparency, and government frugality.

II.
THE “DECLARE WAR” CLAUSE

9. Article I, Section VIII, Clause XI of the United States Constitution provides: “The Congress shall have the power … To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water;”

10. Article II, Section II, Clause I of the United States Constitution provides: “The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States.”

11. The authors of the United States Constitution manifestly intended Article I, Section VIII, Clause XI to fasten exclusive responsibility and authority on the Congress to decide whether to undertake offensive military action.

12. The authors of the United States Constitution believed that individual liberty and the Republic would be endangered by fighting too many wars, not too few.

13. The authors of the United States Constitution understood that to aggrandize power and to leave a historical legacy, the executive in all countries chronically inflates danger manifold to justify warfare.

14. John Jay, the first Chief Justice of the United States, in Federalist 4 noted:

[A]bsolute monarchs will often make war when their nations are to get nothing by it, but for the purposes and objects merely personal, such as thirst for military glory, revenge for personal affronts, ambition, or private compacts to aggrandize or support their particular families or partisans. These and a variety of other motives, which affect only the mind of the sovereign, often lead him to engage in wars not sanctified by justice or the voice and interests of his people.

15. Alexander Hamilton explained in Federalist 69 that the president’s Commander-in-Chief authority

…would be nominally the same with that of the King of Great Britain, but in substance much inferior to it. It would amount to nothing more than the supreme command and direction of the military and naval forces, as first general and admiral of the confederacy; while that of the British king extends to the declaring of war, and to the raising and regulating of fleets and armies; all which by the constitution under consideration would appertain to the Legislature.

16. In a written exchange with Alexander Hamilton under the pseudonym Helvidius, James Madison wrote:

In no part of the constitution is more wisdom to be found, than in the clause which confides the question of war or peace to the legislature, and not to the executive department. Beside the objection to such a mixture to heterogeneous powers, the trust and the temptation would be too great for any one man; not such as nature may offer as the prodigy of many centuries, but such as may be expected in the ordinary successions of magistracy. War is in fact the true nurse of executive aggrandizement. In war, a physical force is to be created; and it is the executive will, which is to direct it. In war, the public treasures are to be unlocked; and it is the executive hand which is to dispense them. In war, the honours and emoluments of office are to be multiplied; and it is the executive patronage under which they are to be enjoyed. It is in war, finally, that laurels are to be gathered, and it is the executive brow they are to encircle. The strongest passions and most dangerous weaknesses of the human breast; ambition, avarice, vanity, the honourable or venial love of fame, are all in conspiracy against the desire and duty of peace.

17. James Madison also wrote as Helvidius to Alexander Hamilton:

Those who are to conduct a war cannot in the nature of things, be proper or safe judges, whether a war ought to be commenced, continued, or concluded. They are barred from the latter functions by a great principle in free government, analogous to that which separates the sword from the purse, or the power of executing from the power of enacting laws.

18. On June 29, 1787, at the Federal Convention, James Madison explained that an executive crowned with war powers invites tyranny and the reduction of citizens to vassalage:

In time of actual war, great discretionary powers are constantly given to the Executive Magistrate. Constant apprehension of War, has the same tendency to render the head too large for the body. A standing military force, with an overgrown Executive will not long be safe companions to liberty. The means of defence agst. foreign danger, have been always the instruments of tyranny at home. Among the Romans it was a standing maxim to excite a war, whenever a revolt was apprehended. Throughout all Europe, the armies kept up under the pretext of defending, have enslaved the people.

19. In a letter dated April 4, 1798, James Madison wrote to Thomas Jefferson:

The constitution supposes, what the History of all Governments demonstrates, that the Executive is the branch of power most interested in war, & most prone to it. It has accordingly with studied care, vested the question of war in the Legislature. But the Doctrines lately advanced strike at the root of all these provisions, and will deposit the peace of the Country in that Department which the Constitution distrusts as most ready without cause to renounce it. For if the opinion of the President not the facts & proofs themselves are to sway the judgment of Congress, in declaring war, and if the President in the recess of Congress create a foreign mission, appoint the minister, & negociate a War Treaty, without the possibility of a check even from the Senate, untill the measures present alternatives overruling the freedom of its judgment; if again a Treaty when made obliges the Legislature to declare war contrary to its judgment, and in pursuance of the same doctrine, a law declaring war, imposes a like moral obligation, to grant the requisite supplies until it be formally repealed with the consent of the President & Senate, it is evident that the people are cheated out of the best ingredients in their Government, the safeguards of peace which is the greatest of their blessings.

20. During the Pennsylvania Convention to ratify the Constitution, James Wilson, a future Justice of the United States Supreme Court, observed:

This system will not hurry us into war; it is calculated to guard against it. It will not be in the power of a single man, or a single body of men, to involve us in such distress; for the important power of declaring war is vested in the legislature at large: this declaration must he made with the concurrence of the House of Representatives: from this circumstance we may draw a certain conclusion that nothing but our national interest can draw us into a war.

21. In 1793, President George Washington, who presided over the Federal Convention, wrote to South Carolina Governor William Moultrie in regards to a prospective counter-offensive against the American Indian Creek Nation: “The Constitution vests the power of declaring war with Congress, therefore no offensive expedition of importance can be undertaken until after they have deliberated upon the subject, and authorized such a measure.”

22. President Thomas Jefferson, who served as Secretary of State under President Washington, in a statement before Congress regarding Tripoli and the Barbary Pirates, deemed himself “unauthorized by the Constitution, without the sanction of Congress, to go beyond the line of defense.” He amplified: “I communicate [to the Congress] all material information on this subject, that in the exercise of this important function confided by the Constitution to the Legislature exclusively their judgment may form itself on a knowledge and consideration of every circumstance of weight.”

23. In a message to Congress in December, 1805 regarding potential military action to resolve a border dispute with Spain, President Thomas Jefferson acknowledged that “Congress alone is constitutionally invested with the power of changing our condition from peace to war, I have thought it my duty to await their authority for using force.” He requested Congressional authorization for offensive military action, even short of war, elaborating:

Formal war is not necessary—it is not probable it will follow; but the protection of our citizens, the spirit and honor of our country, require that force should be interposed to a certain degree. It will probably contribute to advance the object of peace.

But the course to be pursued will require the command of means which it belongs to Congress exclusively to yield or deny. To them I communicate every fact material for their information, and the documents necessary to enable them to judge for themselves. To their wisdom, then, I look for the course I am to pursue; and will pursue, with sincere zeal, that which they shall approve.

24. In his War Message to Congress on June 1, 1812, President James Madison reaffirmed that the shift in language from make to declare in Article I, Section VIII, Clause XI of the United States Constitution authorized at the Constitutional convention did not empower the Executive to involve the United States military in any action aside from defense against an overt attack. Although President Madison was convinced that Great Britain had undertaken acts of war against the United States, he nevertheless maintained that he could not respond with military force without congressional authorization. He proclaimed:

We behold, in fine, on the side of Great Britain, a state of war against the United States, and on the side of the United States a state of peace toward Great Britain.

Whether the United States shall continue passive under these progressive usurpations and these accumulating wrongs, or, opposing force to force in defense of their national rights, shall commit a just cause into the hands of the Almighty Disposer of Events, avoiding all connections which might entangle it in the contest or views of other powers, and preserving a constant readiness to concur in an honorable re-establishment of peace and friendship, is a solemn question which the Constitution wisely confides to the legislative department of the Government. In recommending it to their early deliberations I am happy in the assurance that the decision will be worthy the enlightened and patriotic councils of a virtuous, a free, and a powerful nation.

25. In his Records of the Convention, 2:318; Madison, 17 Aug., James Madison wrote that the power “To declare war” had been vested in the Congress in lieu of the power “To make war” to leave to the Executive “the power to repel sudden attacks.”

26. Mr. Elbridge Gerry “never expected to hear in a republic a motion to empower the Executive alone to declare war,” but still moved with Mr. Madison “to insert declare—in place of make” in Article I, Section VIII, Clause XI. Id.

27. Mr. George Mason was against “giving the power of war to the Executive, because not safely to be trusted with it; or to the Senate, because not so constructed as to be entitled to it. He was for clogging rather than facilitating war; but for facilitating peace.” Yet Mr. Mason “preferred declare to make.” Id.

28. Mr. Roger Sherman “thought [the proposal] stood very well. The Executive shd. be able to repel and not to commence war.” Id.

29. Delegates to the Federal Convention overwhelmingly approved the motion to insert “declare—in place of make,” to deny the Executive power to initiate military action, but to permit the Executive to repel sudden attacks unilaterally. Id.

30. Then Congressman Abraham Lincoln sermonized:

Allow the President to invade a neighboring nation, whenever he shall deem it necessary to repel an invasion, and you allow him to do so, whenever he may choose to say he deems it necessary for such purpose — and you allow him to make war at pleasure…. Study to see if you can fix any limit to his power in this respect, after you have given him so much as you propose. If, to-day, he should choose to say he thinks it necessary to invade Canada, to prevent the British from invading us, how could you stop him? You may say to him, “I see no probability of the British invading us” but he will say to you “be silent; I see it, if you don’t.”

The provision of the Constitution giving the war-making power to Congress, was dictated, as I understand it, by the following reasons. Kings had always been involving and impoverishing their people in wars, pretending generally, if not always, that the good of the people was the object. This, our Convention understood to be the most oppressive of all Kingly oppressions; and they resolved to so frame the Constitution that no one man should hold the power of bringing this oppression upon us. But your view destroys the whole matter, and places our President where kings have always stood.

31. Crowning the President with unilateral authority to commence war under the banner of anticipatory self-defense, prevention of civilian slaughters, gender discrimination, subjugation of ethnic or religious minorities, or otherwise would empower the President to initiate war without limit, threatening the very existence of the Republic. Although a benevolent Chief Executive might resist abuse of an unlimited war power, the principle, if ever accepted by Congress, would lie around like a loaded weapon ready for use by any successor craving absolute power.

32. Thomas Paine justly and rightly declared in Common Sense that “in America, the law is king. For as in absolute governments the King is law, so in free countries the law ought to be king; and there ought to be no other.”

33. Article 43 Paragraph 3 of the Charter of the United Nations provides that all resolutions or agreements of the United Nations Security Counsel “shall be subject to ratification by the signatory states in accordance with their respective constitutional processes.”

34. Article 43 Paragraph 3 of Charter of the United Nations was included specifically to allay concerns that prevented the United States of America from ratifying the League of Nations Treaty in 1919.

35. That treaty risked crowning the President with the counter-constitutional authority to initiate warfare. On November 19, 1919, in Section II of his Reservations with Regard to Ratification of the Versailles Treaty, to preserve the balance of power established by the United States Constitution from executive usurpation, Senator Henry Cabot Lodge resolved as follows:

The United States assumes no obligation to preserve the territorial integrity or political independence of any other country or to interfere in controversies between nations — whether members of the League or not — under the provisions of Article 10, or to employ the military or naval forces of the United States under any article of the treaty for any purpose, unless in any particular case the Congress, which, under the Constitution, has the sole power to declare war or authorize the employment of the military or naval forces of the United States, shall by act or joint resolution so provide.

The rejection of Lodge’s reservations by President Woodrow Wilson and his Senate allies insured defeat of the treaty.

36. Section 2(c) of the War Powers Resolution of 1973 clarifies Presidential authority to undertake military action as follows:

The constitutional powers of the President as Commander-in-Chief to introduce United States Armed Forces into hostilities, or into situations where imminent involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated by the circumstances, are exercised only pursuant to (1) a declaration of war, (2) specific statutory authorization, or (3) a national emergency created by attack upon the United States, its territories or possessions, or its armed forces.

37. In United States v. Smith, 27 F. Cas. 1192 (1806), Supreme Court Justice William Paterson, a delegate to the Federal Convention from New Jersey, wrote on behalf of a federal circuit court:

There is a manifest distinction between our going to war with a nation at peace, and a war being made against us by an actual invasion, or a formal declaration. In the former case it is the exclusive province of Congress to change a state of peace into a state of war.

38. In Geofroy v. Riggs, 133 U.S. 258, 267 (1890), the Supreme Court of the United States held:

The treaty power, as expressed in the Constitution, is in terms unlimited except by those restraints which are found in that instrument against the action of the government or of its departments, and those arising from the nature of the government itself and of that of the States. It would not be contended that it extends so far as to authorize what the Constitution forbids, or a change in the character of the government, or in that of one of the States, or a cession of any portion of the territory of the latter, without its consent.

39. In his concurrence in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer, 343 U.S. 579, 642-643 (1952), which rebuked President Harry Truman’s claim of unilateral war powers in the Korean War, Justice Robert Jackson elaborated:

Nothing in our Constitution is plainer than that declaration of a war is entrusted only to Congress. Of course, a state of war may in fact exist without a formal declaration. But no doctrine that the Court could promulgate would seem to me more sinister and alarming than that a President whose conduct of foreign affairs is so largely uncontrolled, and often even is unknown, can vastly enlarge his mastery over the internal affairs of the country by his own commitment of the Nation’s armed forces to some foreign venture.

40. All treaties are subservient to the exclusive congressional power to commence war. In Reid v. Covert, 354 U.S. 1, 18 (1957), the United States Supreme Court held:

There is nothing in [the Constitution’s text] which intimates that treaties and laws enacted pursuant to them do not have to comply with the provisions of the Constitution. Nor is there anything in the debates which accompanied the drafting and ratification of the Constitution which even suggests such a result.

41. Unconstitutional usurpations by one branch of government of powers entrusted to a coequal branch are not rendered constitutional by repetition. The United States Supreme Court held unconstitutional hundreds of laws enacted by Congress over the course of five decades that included a legislative veto of executive actions in INS v. Chada, 462 U.S. 919 (1982).

42. In their dissent in Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, 542 U.S. 507 (2004), Justices John Paul Stevens and Antonin Scalia recognized the “Founders’ general distrust of military power lodged with the President, including the authority to commence war:

No fewer than 10 issues of the Federalist were devoted in whole or part to allaying fears of oppression from the proposed Constitution’s authorization of standing armies in peacetime. Many safeguards in the Constitution reflect these concerns. Congress’s authority “[t]o raise and support Armies” was hedged with the proviso that “no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years.” U.S. Const., Art. 1, §8, cl. 12. Except for the actual command of military forces, all authorization for their maintenance and all explicit authorization for their use is placed in the control of Congress under Article I, rather than the President under Article II. As Hamilton explained, the President’s military authority would be “much inferior” to that of the British King… (Citing Federalist 69, Supra.)

43. On December 20, 2007, then Senator Hillary Clinton proclaimed: “The President has the solemn duty to defend our Nation. If the country is under truly imminent threat of attack, of course the President must take appropriate action to defend us. At the same time, the Constitution requires Congress to authorize war. I do not believe that the President can take military action — including any kind of strategic bombing — against Iran without congressional authorization.”

44. Then Senator Joseph Biden stated in a speech at the Iowa City Public Library in 2007 regarding potential military action in Iran that unilateral action by the President would be an impeachable offense under the Constitution:

It is precisely because the consequences of war – intended or otherwise – can be so profound and complicated that our Founding Fathers vested in Congress, not the President, the power to initiate war, except to repel an imminent attack on the United States or its citizens.

They reasoned that requiring the President to come to Congress first would slow things down… allow for more careful decision making before sending Americans to fight and die… and ensure broader public support.

The Founding Fathers were, as in most things, profoundly right.

That’s why I want to be very clear: if the President takes us to war with Iran without Congressional approval, I will call for his impeachment.

I do not say this lightly or to be provocative. I am dead serious. I have chaired the Senate Judiciary Committee. I still teach constitutional law. I’ve consulted with some of our leading constitutional scholars. The Constitution is clear. And so am I.

I’m saying this now to put the administration on notice and hopefully to deter the President from taking unilateral action in the last year of his administration.

If war is warranted with a nation of 70 million people, it warrants coming to Congress and the American people first.

45. In a speech on the Senate Floor in 1998, then Senator Joseph Biden maintained: “…the only logical conclusion is that the framers [of the United States Constitution] intended to grant to Congress the power to initiate all hostilities, even limited wars.”

46. On December 20, 2007, then Senator Barack Obama informed the Boston Globe, based upon his extensive knowledge of the United States Constitution: “The President does not have power under the Constitution to unilaterally authorize a military attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation.”

III.
USURPATION OF THE WAR POWER OVER LIBYA

47. President Barack Obama’s military attacks against Libya constitute acts of war.

48. Congressman J. Randy Forbes (VA-4) had the following exchange with Secretary of Defense Robert Gates during a March 31, 2011 House Armed Services Committee Hearing on the legality of the present military operation in Libya:

Congressman Forbes: Mr. Secretary, if tomorrow a foreign nation intentionally, for whatever reason, launched a Tomahawk missile into New York City, would that be considered an act of war against the United States?

Secretary Gates: Probably so.

Congressman Forbes: Then I would assume the same laws would apply if we launched a Tomahawk missile at another nation—is that also true?

Secretary Gates: You’re getting into constitutional law here and I am no expert on it.

Congressman Forbes: Mr. Secretary, you’re the Secretary of Defense. You ought to be an expert on what’s an act of war or not. If it’s an act of war to launch a Tomahawk missile on New York City would it not also be an act of war to launch a Tomahawk missile by us at another nation?

Secretary Gates: Presumably.

49. Since the passage of United Nations Security Council resolution 1973 on March 19, 2011, the United States has detonated over 200 tomahawk land attack cruise missiles and 455 precision-guided bombs on Libyan soil.

50. Libya posed no actual or imminent threat to the United States when President Obama unleashed Operation Odyssey Dawn.

51. On March 27, 2011, Secretary of Defense Robert Gates stated that Libya never posed an “actual or imminent threat to the United States.” He further stated that Libya has never constituted a “vital interest” to the United States.

52. United Nations Security Council resolution 1973 directs an indefinite United States military quagmire in Libya, authorizing “all necessary measures” to protect Libyan civilians, which clearly contemplates removal by force of the murderous regime of Col. Muammar Qadhafi.

53. In a Letter From the President to the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the President Pro Tempore of the Senate sent March 21, 2011, President Barack Obama informed Members of Congress that “U.S. forces have targeted the Qadhafi regime’s air defense systems, command and control structures, and other capabilities of Qadhafi’s armed forces used to attack civilians and civilian populated areas. We will seek a rapid, but responsible, transition of operations to coalition, regional, or international organizations that are postured to continue activities as may be necessary to realize the objectives of U.N. Security Council Resolutions 1970 and 1973.”

54. In his March 21, 2011 letter, President Barack Obama further informed Members of Congress that he opted to take unilateral military action “…in support of international efforts to protect civilians and prevent a humanitarian disaster.”

55. President Barack Obama has usurped congressional authority to decide on war or peace with Libya, and has declared he will persist in additional usurpations of the congressional power to commence war whenever he decrees it would advance his idea of the national interest. On March 28, 2011, he declared to Congress and the American people: “I have made it clear that I will never hesitate to use our military swiftly, decisively, and unilaterally when necessary to defend our people, our homeland, our allies, and our core interests” (emphasis added).

56. President Obama’s humanitarian justification for war in Libya establishes a threshold that would justify his initiation of warfare in scores of nations around the globe, including Iran, North Korea, Syria, Sudan, Myanmar, China, Belarus, Zimbabwe, Cuba, and Russia.

57. In Olmstead v. United States, 277 U.S. 438 (1928), Justice Louis D. Brandeis wrote on behalf of a majority of the United States Supreme Court:

Experience should teach us to be most on our guard to protect liberty when the Government’s purposes are beneficent. Men born to freedom are naturally alert to repel invasion of their liberty by evil-minded rulers. The greatest dangers to liberty lurk in insidious encroachment by men of zeal, well meaning but without understanding.

58. President Barack Obama has signed an order, euphemistically named a “Presidential Finding,” authorizing covert U.S. government support for rebel forces seeking to oust Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi, further entangling the United States in the Libyan conflict, despite earlier promises of restraint. Truth is invariably the first casualty of war.

59. In response to questions by Members of Congress during a classified briefing on March 30, 2011, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton indicated that the President needs no Congressional authorization for his attack on the Libyan nation, and will ignore any Congressional attempt by resolution or otherwise to constrain or halt United States participation in the Libyan war.

60. On March 30, 2011, by persistent silence or otherwise, Secretary Clinton rebuffed congressional inquiries into President Obama’s view of the constitutionality of the War Powers Resolution of 1973. She failed to cite a single judicial decision in support of President Obama’s recent actions, relying instead on the undisclosed legal opinions of White House attorneys.

61. President Barack Obama, in flagrant violation of his constitutional oath to execute his office as President of the United States and preserve and protect the United States Constitution, has usurped the exclusive authority of Congress to authorize the initiation of war, in that on March 19, 2011 President Obama initiated an offensive military attack against the Republic of Libya without congressional authorization. In so doing, President Obama has arrested the rule of law, and saluted a vandalizing of the Constitution that will occasion ruination of the Republic, the crippling of individual liberty, and a Leviathan government unless the President is impeached by the House of Representatives and removed from office by the Senate.

In all of this, President Barack Obama has acted in a manner contrary to his trust as President and subversive of constitutional government, to the great prejudice of the cause of law and justice and to the manifest injury of the people of the United States.

A Historical Reminder.

2011-01-18T17:59:00.008-05:00

The True Story of Gun Control

We can't let it happen here.

Who would have guessed. The video has now been removed. So... here's another link:

http://www.naturalnews.tv/v.asp?v=5D929F4D85DA1BF1A476BE8901E30F2C

Madison Co. to evict man from camper

2010-12-18T07:37:00.002-05:00

Madison Co. to evict man from camper

and he owns the 36 acres is trailer is on. THIS IS DEAD FUCKING WRONG!!! And I don't blame him if he off's the individuals that attempt to evict him.

Human Rights Council Takes Aim at U.S.

2010-11-05T09:20:00.003-04:00

U.N. Human Rights Council to Take Aim at New Target: United States

Fuck these assholes. They're Evil Incarnate!

Suspicious Packages Reported on Multiple UPS Flights

2010-10-29T12:08:00.003-04:00

Authorities Investigating Suspicious UPS Packages in Philadelphia Airport, NYC Truck

Uh... Shouldn't they be finding these kinds of packages before they are loaded onto a plane?

Fuck Obama Care.

2010-10-27T17:55:00.003-04:00

Dr. David Janda explains rationing and why Dr. Rob Steele must defeat Dingell.

Up to $1 Billion in U.S. Aid Winds Up In Taliban Coffers

2010-10-27T17:43:00.003-04:00

$1 Billion in U.S. Aid Winds Up With Taliban

I am sick of my money going to this kind of foolish, corrupt, bullshit! I say fuck foreign aid for anyone IMHO. If you can't beat the corruption, KILL those that are corrupt! Piss on it!

Never Gonna Stand For This.

2010-10-25T23:04:00.003-04:00

Give "We the People" credit for restraint! C'mon!

Aide to Harry Reid Lied to Feds, Submitted False Documents About Sham Marriage

2010-10-25T20:17:00.004-04:00

EXCLUSIVE: Harry Reid Aide Lied to Feds Over Sham Marriage

What a surprise. This shit happens with people from all nationalities. And it's DEAD FUCKING WRONG! Fuck him, and Fuck them.

Obama: Voters 'Scared,' Not Thinking Clearly About Election

2010-10-18T14:25:00.003-04:00

Fear Driving Voters to GOP, Obama Says

Yeah. Fear from globalist bullshit from you and others like you. Cut the smooth talk. Many can see through it now. It's your smooth talking crap that Americans aren't falling for.

A Bad Idea.

2010-10-15T08:11:00.003-04:00

Arabs May Ask UN to Recognize Palestinian State

Zec 12:3 And in that day will I make Jerusalem a burdensome stone for all people: all that burden themselves with it shall be cut in pieces, though all the people of the earth be gathered together against it.

Fabian Socialism is Pure Evil.

2010-10-07T18:06:00.002-04:00

The Obama Crotch Salute.

2010-10-07T16:15:00.006-04:00

This is the dickhead that was elected President of our country? You know, the United States of America. I believe that saluting the flag goes with that, and also to honor the servicemen who died, or is he above that? He showers us all with flowery words and attempts to dazzle us with his bullshit, but his actions speak louder. How many passes do you have to give this asshole before you realize he is not one of us and is working on his own agenda and is not good for America? He won’t salute our flag and pay respect to our troops but he will bow to a Saudi Prince.

Obama sucks!

RETURN TO SENDER: Afghans Seize Explosives From Iran

2010-10-06T20:55:00.002-04:00

Afghan Police Seize 22 Tons of Explosives From Iran

Light'em up before you send'em back!

Congress Flees D.C. Without Passing Budget

2010-09-30T07:09:00.003-04:00

Congress Flees D.C. to Campaign — Without Passing Budget

Is there a cauldron under those hands?

Dad Throws Flag for Praying in Football

2010-09-29T21:18:00.001-04:00

Pregame Prayers at Pee Wee Football Games Are Out of Bounds, Florida Dad Says

The man is dead wrong. As are many others. It's "freedom OF" not "freedom FROM". Fuck him.

Inhofe Says EPA's New Boiler Rule Could Kill Nearly 800,000 Manufacturing Jobs

2010-09-28T22:38:00.001-04:00

The top Republican on a Senate environmental panel released a scathing report Tuesday that he contends shows that the Environmental Protection Agency's new proposed rule on cleaning up boilers nationwide could devastate America's manufacturing base and imperil hundreds of thousands of jobs without providing any real public health or environmental benefits.

Would not surprise me a bit! Probably just more green sociocomi garbage.

Applause for Ahmadinejad?

2010-09-23T18:47:00.006-04:00

U.N.-BELIEVABLE: Applause as Ahmadinejad Spews 9/11 Insults

Let's see how the pundits reply to this crap. Personally I think it would be a great time to assassinate Ahmadinejad and a few above him whoever they are. Anyone who does, even if they are my enemy, would go up a couple notches on my "I Like" scale.

And the U.N. wreaks of corruption. It would be a good time to take that whole organization down as well.

Satanic, global elitists are causing all this shit. Can't wait until "Mashiach Nagid" comes to keep us all honest.

FTW!

2010-09-22T17:38:00.002-04:00

Obama: Less U.S. Spending, More Policies to Help World

How about we worry about our own nation first, Slick?

A Sad Reality.

2010-09-22T08:05:00.004-04:00

Strange Coincidence?

2010-09-21T18:45:00.005-04:00

Just wondering why Soros and Huffington look and sound so much alike. Are they siblings? It's kinda spooky.

Look Folks!

2010-09-21T00:36:00.004-04:00

From Jihad Watch: Rally in New York City.

Who's telling the truth? It's up to us to decide.

Pathetic.

2010-09-19T09:09:00.001-04:00

Revisionist Recitation: Obama Omits ‘Creator’ While Quoting Declaration

It's pretty sickening. He is sickening.

Flashback: Remember Christine O‘Donnell on ’Politically Incorrect‘ in the ’90s?

2010-09-15T21:30:00.005-04:00

Flashback: Remember Christine O‘Donnell on ’Politically Incorrect‘ in the ’90s?

Sorry Beck, but I cannot stomach Bill Maher longer than about 36 seconds. O'Donnell rocks so far. We'll see what she brings to the table, but she's already more pro-gun and pro-truth, than Mike Castle (R) or Biden (D(Socialist)).

We'll see, but please... Spare me the Maher stuff!

Holding a Drink Makes You Seem Dumb?

2010-09-15T09:14:00.001-04:00

Just Holding a Drink Makes You Seem Dumb, Study Says

This may be true, and I tend to agree to an extent, but when I am drinking it sure makes everyone else in the world more interesting.

Michael Goodwin Asks The Question...

2010-09-13T23:59:00.001-04:00

Is Obama Feeding the Myth That America Is Islamaphobic?

I say Roger That! But rather than a phobia I think folks are just sick of the IslamaBullshit.

The Grand Design - Still Rollin!

2010-09-03T16:55:00.013-04:00

The Grand Design: A video by G. Edward Griffin circa 1968:

The Grand Design (Part 1)
The Grand Design (Part 2)
The Grand Design (Part 3)
The Grand Design (Part 4)
The Grand Design (Part 5)
The Grand Design (Part 6)
The Grand Design (Part 7)
The Grand Design (Part 8)

After 40 years, hindsight makes this guy look like a genius. Perhaps he is. Apparently few listened then and it's my observation that few are listening now.

We must not fall into the trap of 'The Grand Designers' by hating & killing each other through racist tendencies, as the Designer's foment this behavior artificially to further their plan. This is still very real after 40 years and if folks still can't see the truth after all we've seen since, well then, let them have the Grand Designers' New World Order. I will rather stand firm, even if it means a nuke going off in my front yard.

Griffin called 'em out 40 years ago and now you can hear designers and puppets like Nixon, Soros, Obama, the Bush's, Blair, the Rockefeller's, Clinton, Brown, Gore, Kissinger, Sarkozy, and many others saying and doing it now. Wake up folks. Have you been in a 50 year slumber? It's not a conspiracy any more people. And the Bible authors said it long before Griffin or anyone else. So get ready. It's coming sooner or later. Resistance will just slow the process.

For comfort and wisdom:

Eph 6:12 For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.

Mat 10:28 And fear not them which kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul: but rather fear him which is able to destroy both soul and body in hell.

1Th 4:16 For the Lord himself shall descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel, and with the trump of God: and the dead in Christ shall rise first:
1Th 4:17 Then we which are alive and remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds, to meet the Lord in the air: and so shall we ever be with the Lord.
1Th 4:18 Wherefore comfort one another with these words.

March on folks - we're in for a wild ride!

Absolute Hypocrites!

2010-09-03T08:07:00.014-04:00

NAACP, Left-Leaning Media Groups Form Tea Party Tracking Site

Why dont you start by tracking this pathetic shit:

Beat Whitey Night.

I have heard nothing of this via the lame stream media.

It's like the fox guarding the hen house. Do be careful while tracking. I think a few hens and a couple roosters could put the hurt on the fox.

Yeah they come to snuff the rooster
Yeah here come the rooster, yeah
You know he ain't gonna die
No, no, no, you know he ain't gonna die

;->

What?!

2010-09-02T13:05:00.007-04:00

Hawking Says God Not Needed for Creation

God is the only hope this broken man has. But... That's the case for the rest of us as well.

Pray!

Blougars are some Mean Bitches.

2010-09-02T12:33:00.003-04:00

I know a few. Go Chuck. Go NRA!

Trigger The Vote!

Hmm...

2010-09-02T12:08:00.002-04:00

Oil Rig Reportedly Explodes Off Louisiana Coast

I am beginning to believe these oil rig explosions are beyond the odds of accident or chance.

New World Order Factions Struggle for Control

2010-08-31T14:27:00.006-04:00

This was written 10 years ago. We are now well into this crap 10 years later:

WORLD AFFAIRS BRIEF February 4, 2000 Copyright Joel Skousen. Quotations with attribution permitted.

YEAR 2000 PUSH FOR GLOBALIZATION BEGINS IN EARNEST

I wrote at the end of 1999 that US citizens have been deeply probed about how much resistance they would offer to a variety of global agendas. By and large Americans have failed to provide any meaningful resistance. Already we are beginning to see the results. The NWO crowd is moving ahead with major proposals in earnest and aren’t even bothering to be subtle about it. They are on a roll and the tidal waves of change are sweeping in from multiple directions. Let me summarize what is happening.

THE NEW REPUBLIC FLAUNTS AMERICA’S LOSS OF SOVEREIGNTY AND CHEERS!

The front cover of the January 17th issue of The New Republic, an old left publication turned politically chic, dramatically proclaims, “America Is Surrendering Its Sovereignty To A World Government. HOORAY!” The editors correctly assume that Americans know nothing about the devastating effects that such a loss of sovereignty would have on taxes, personal liberty, court procedures, property rights, religious liberty and defense (both national and personal). The establishment is learning fast that as long as they shield Americans from any direct effects of UN rule until after the US is irreversibly integrated into global legal structures there will be no resistance. The inability of Americans to foresee the results of globalization and project the theory into practice is a direct result of a public education system that systematically denies essential information about how liberty is maintained and how majority rule in a democracy must be chained to constitutional limitations by tight legal language.

... for the rest.

ANALYSIS: These cogent comments highlight the visible rift developing between leftist organizations and the US globalist leaders (who have misled European socialists and Communists into thinking they share the same goals). Indeed, the two groups share the same goals about global socialism, but the European left is fast awakening to the realization that NWO leaders have a lock-hold on ultimate power and aren’t about to share any of that power with ideological Marxists and Communists. We will watch closely the negotiations at the UN Millennial summit on Global Governance in September where we will see how the Europeans (who have a majority of allies in the UN general assembly) will fare at implementing their 12 strategic objectives that we discussed last week. About half of these objectives are focused on bringing the powerful independent globalist organs (IMF, World Bank, BIS, and WTO) under direct UN control. In this way, the Europeans can use their majority allies in the General Assembly to wrest power from the US. That is why the Europeans must eliminate the Security Council’s veto power, so that the General Assembly votes (almost all pro-Communist) will prevail.

I don’t think the Europeans will succeed, but this is a source of underlying tension between the NWO leaders in the European Union and those in the US. British leaders participates in both camps: the Tories have been long aligned with the US faction of the NWO and the Labor Party has been allied with the European Marxists. At the present, Labor PM Tony Blair is trying to pull Britain into the European camp, while the Tories under William Hague are beginning to resist. Remember that the European socialist leaders are aligned with the Socialist International--a Communist front, directed from Moscow. That is why Russia’s secret leadership (i.e.:Boris Berezovsky) keeps a physical presence in Paris.

Europeans, being ideological Marxists, rather than simply power conspirators like the US faction, are hostile towards private business. On the other hand, the US faction of the NWO, which currently holds most of the power, is willing to court big business and use those relationships to extend their base of power and financial control. It is this strategy of harnessing and corrupting the corporate financial world that has given the US faction the upper hand in controlling the world’s money. In addition, this split in NWO power may also explain why the Russians are targeting only America and Britain for a nuclear first strike and not Europe. The Russians are, perhaps, much more confident about the level of control and influence they have with European socialist leaders. They don’t trust the Americans, despite American aid and its willingness to unilaterally disarm. Both Russia and China view war with the US as inevitable. What almost everyone else fails to realize, as well, is that China views war with Russia as inevitable too.

Truly Pathetic.

2010-08-31T14:06:00.002-04:00

Record number in government anti-poverty programs

What are you bums and elites gonna do when the rest of us give up?

Cusack Is A Fucking Moron!

2010-08-31T10:49:00.000-04:00

John Cusack Calls for 'Satanic Death' of Fox News, GOP Leaders

and most twitt's are.

I Think You Mean... People that actually care...

2010-08-31T10:47:00.005-04:00

Poll: Strongest Opinions About U.S. Policies, Most Unhappy With Obama

are those which are most unhappy with Obama.

Fuck Cass Sunstein and the EPA!

2010-08-27T14:52:00.005-04:00

EPA attempting to ban lead bullets.

You both suck!

Let them know what you think:

Steps to take:

1. Submit comment online to the EPA.

2. Contact Lisa Jackson directly to voice your opposition to the ban:

Lisa P. Jackson
Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW
Washington, DC 20460
(202) 564-4700
Fax: (202) 501-1450
Email: jackson.lisa@epa.gov

This is Pure Tyrannical Bullshit!

2010-08-27T13:01:00.002-04:00

Court allows agents to secretly put GPS trackers on cars

A warrant should be required for any evidence using this method to be valid in court. Doing this without a warrant this is UNconstitutional. My car is my property and it should not matter where it is parked, driveway or anywhere else. This is dead wrong!

I am sick of the tyranny in this country.

Stop ACTA!

2010-08-24T07:38:00.005-04:00

WTF is with the Talk of Policia Federals in NY?!

2010-08-23T15:19:00.015-04:00

Mexican Officials to Patrol Staten Island Following Latest Bias Attack

Mexican Police To Patrol NY?

Mexican Police Patrol New York.

I am sorry this Mexican dude got his ass beat in NY... but having Mexican Federal Police patrolling American streets or Mexican officials of any kind manipulating our government officials is fucking pure bullshit! They better not come my way. Just jail the perpetrators and deport the dude that got his ass beat if he's an illegal.

WTF is happening to this country?

This is Wisdom.

2010-08-22T08:35:00.002-04:00

They ask... How Could an American President Be so Anti-American?

Because he is merely a puppet for the global elite. Wake up folks!

Walking Right Into It

2010-08-22T08:10:00.013-04:00

Obama Administration Thinks Road to Tehran Runs Through Jerusalem...
"the emergence of an independent, democratic and viable Palestinian state living side by side in peace and security with Israel and its other neighbors."

1st Thess 5:3:
"For when they shall say, Peace and safety; then sudden destruction cometh upon them, as travail upon a woman with child; and they shall not escape."

Mr. Big Mouth

2010-08-22T07:42:00.008-04:00

Iran Unveils Its Unmanned 'Ambassador of Death'... "The scope of Iran's reaction will include the entire the earth."

This morons mouth alone would be enough for me to order a strike! Good thing for the world that I am not the HMFIC.

False Flag Alert!

2010-08-21T16:04:00.006-04:00

Clinton Invokes Climate Change Debate to Explain Pakistan Floods

Albeit a soft version. It's just a bad time to live in parts of Pakistan. Weather is chance. Like we can control it via any means.

Get real.

Pretty Fucking Ghey.

2010-08-21T10:07:00.001-04:00

Full Trailer For Facebook Movie ‘The Social Network’ Hits The Web

Just straight-up ghey.

The Gipper Speaks for Me.

2010-08-19T11:07:00.000-04:00

I Cannot Agree More!

2010-08-19T08:24:00.003-04:00

Appleseed Teaching History with Guns

Get Involved!

The Polls Show...

2010-08-19T08:11:00.003-04:00

Nearly 1 in 5 Americans Thinks Obama Is Muslim, Survey Shows

Poll: Only a third of Americans say Obama is Christian; almost one in five say he's Muslim

This American thinks he worships himself.

A List of Commi Bastards!

2010-08-16T20:04:00.011-04:00

American Socialists Release Names of 70 Congressional Democrats in Their Ranks

Taken from original post by Jim Hoft on Friday, August 13, 2010, 4:16 PM.

Here is where folks should start while cleaning out our corrupt, immoral officials:

The Socialist Party of America announced in their October 2009 newsletter that 70 Congressional democrats currently belong to their caucus. This admission was recently posted on Scribd.com:

American Socialist Voter–
Q: How many members of the U.S. Congress are also members of the DSA?
A: Seventy

Q: How many of the DSA members sit on the Judiciary Committee?
A: Eleven: John Conyers [Chairman of the Judiciary Committee], Tammy Baldwin, Jerrold Nadler, Luis Gutierrez,
Melvin Watt, Maxine Waters, Hank Johnson, Steve Cohen, Barbara Lee, Robert Wexler, Linda Sanchez [there are 23 Democrats on the Judiciary Committee of which eleven, almost half, are now members of the DSA].

Q: Who are these members of 111th Congress?
A: See the listing below

Co-Chairs
Hon. Raúl M. Grijalva (AZ-07)
Hon. Lynn Woolsey (CA-06)

Vice Chairs
Hon. Diane Watson (CA-33)
Hon. Sheila Jackson-Lee (TX-18)
Hon. Mazie Hirono (HI-02)
Hon. Dennis Kucinich (OH-10)

Senate Members
Hon. Bernie Sanders (VT)

House Members
Hon. Neil Abercrombie (HI-01)
Hon. Tammy Baldwin (WI-02)
Hon. Xavier Becerra (CA-31)
Hon. Madeleine Bordallo (GU-AL)
Hon. Robert Brady (PA-01)
Hon. Corrine Brown (FL-03)
Hon. Michael Capuano (MA-08)
Hon. André Carson (IN-07)
Hon. Donna Christensen (VI-AL)
Hon. Yvette Clarke (NY-11)
Hon. William “Lacy” Clay (MO-01)
Hon. Emanuel Cleaver (MO-05)
Hon. Steve Cohen (TN-09)
Hon. John Conyers (MI-14)
Hon. Elijah Cummings (MD-07)
Hon. Danny Davis (IL-07)
Hon. Peter DeFazio (OR-04)
Hon. Rosa DeLauro (CT-03)
Rep. Donna F. Edwards (MD-04)
Hon. Keith Ellison (MN-05)
Hon. Sam Farr (CA-17)
Hon. Chaka Fattah (PA-02)
Hon. Bob Filner (CA-51)
Hon. Barney Frank (MA-04)
Hon. Marcia L. Fudge (OH-11)
Hon. Alan Grayson (FL-08)
Hon. Luis Gutierrez (IL-04)
Hon. John Hall (NY-19)
Hon. Phil Hare (IL-17)
Hon. Maurice Hinchey (NY-22)
Hon. Michael Honda (CA-15)
Hon. Jesse Jackson, Jr. (IL-02)
Hon. Eddie Bernice Johnson (TX-30)
Hon. Hank Johnson (GA-04)
Hon. Marcy Kaptur (OH-09)
Hon. Carolyn Kilpatrick (MI-13)
Hon. Barbara Lee (CA-09)
Hon. John Lewis (GA-05)
Hon. David Loebsack (IA-02)
Hon. Ben R. Lujan (NM-3)
Hon. Carolyn Maloney (NY-14)
Hon. Ed Markey (MA-07)
Hon. Jim McDermott (WA-07)
Hon. James McGovern (MA-03)
Hon. George Miller (CA-07)
Hon. Gwen Moore (WI-04)
Hon. Jerrold Nadler (NY-08)
Hon. Eleanor Holmes-Norton (DC-AL)
Hon. John Olver (MA-01)
Hon. Ed Pastor (AZ-04)
Hon. Donald Payne (NJ-10)
Hon. Chellie Pingree (ME-01)
Hon. Charles Rangel (NY-15)
Hon. Laura Richardson (CA-37)
Hon. Lucille Roybal-Allard (CA-34)
Hon. Bobby Rush (IL-01)
Hon. Linda Sánchez (CA-47)
Hon. Jan Schakowsky (IL-09)
Hon. José Serrano (NY-16)
Hon. Louise Slaughter (NY-28)
Hon. Pete Stark (CA-13)
Hon. Bennie Thompson (MS-02)
Hon. John Tierney (MA-06)
Hon. Nydia Velazquez (NY-12)
Hon. Maxine Waters (CA-35)
Hon. Mel Watt (NC-12)
Hon. Henry Waxman (CA-30)
Hon. Peter Welch (VT-AL)
Hon. Robert Wexler (FL-19)

Let us be done with them all!

Also see: How to Keep the USA From Becoming the United States of Arabia

Read This Simple Shit.

2010-08-15T09:38:00.001-04:00

Big Deal.

2010-08-07T07:00:00.002-04:00

Does New Al Qaeda Chief Pose Major Threat to U.S.?

Ain't Skeered.

Immigration, Arizona & Virginia.

2010-08-05T07:51:00.010-04:00

Enough with the bullshit already about authorities asking people for papers. I have no sympathy at all.

I had to respond to E-Verify forms to prove my immigration status and all I did was go to work that day. I was not involved in any crime. I just went to work and had to comply with E-Verify.

So... enough with the crying about proving your citizenship, especially if you have been involved in a crime, perpetrator or otherwise.

Obama & Zakat

2010-08-03T18:40:00.007-04:00

What is Zakat? Essentially money that is collected for charitable purposes.

The recipients of collected Kakat:

* Fuqaraa: Those who own property in excess of basic necessities but below the value of Nisab.

* Masakeen: Persons of extreme poverty who possess no wealth whatsoever.

* Aamileen: (Zakat collector) Those persons who are appointed by an Islamic Head of State or Government to collect Zakat. It is not necessary that this be a needy person.

* Muallafatul Quloob: Those poor and needy persons who are given Zakat with the intentions of solidifying their hearts because they maybe recently converted to Islam or to bring them closer to Islam.

* Ar-Riqaab: slaves whose masters have agreed to set them free on a payment of a fixed amount. Zakat may be used to purchase their freedom.

* Ibnus-Sabeel: A traveler, who, whilst wealthy at his residence, is stranded and in need of financial assistance.

* Al Ghaarimeen: A person whose debts exceeds his assets and his net assets (after deducting his liabilities) is below the Nisab limit. To determine whether a person qualifies, his basic necessities of life (house, furniture, clothes, vehicle, etc.) will not be taken into account. It is conditional that the debts were not created for any un-Islamic or sinful purpose.

Sounds pretty noble so far. But....

* Fi Sabeelillah: Those who are away from home in the path of Allah. Those in Jihaad, those seeking knowledge or a stranded Haji may be assist with Zakat if they are in need.

I find the last category of (Fi Sabeelillah) especially disturbing.

Fuck this man.

Teacher Facing Assault Charge for Alleged Spanking

2010-07-31T10:10:00.002-04:00

This is lame and absolutely ridiculous. She deserved the ass whipping! He did nothing wrong. This is simple discipline and there is not a damn thing wrong with it. I had my ass whipped several times with a 3/8 to 1/2 inch wooden paddle and have no regrets. The children need to grow a spine, and even more so, the parents and teachers need to step up, act responsible, and use the disciplinary authority they rightly possess.

Listen Up BoneHeads!

2010-07-29T13:08:00.003-04:00

If we're gonna go to war with anyone... Then we need a congressional declaration of war! Otherwise Fuck it!

Hehehe.

2010-07-21T20:09:00.001-04:00

:->

A Further Waste of Taxpayer Dollars.

2010-07-16T15:09:00.004-04:00

Armed Escorts to Accompany New Mexico Livestock Inspectors

Just let the inspectors carry a couple firearms themselves! Why is it our leaders always pick the most costly and cumbersome solutions to simple problems?

No wonder our fucking country is broke!

In Absolute Solidarity!

2010-07-14T06:17:00.001-04:00

This Must Be Stopped.

2010-07-14T00:45:00.002-04:00

Enough said.

Folks, You're Acting Like a Bunch of Morons.

2010-07-13T19:54:00.004-04:00

Campaign Heats Up to Move All-Star Game Out of Arizona Over Immigration Concerns

Let those that wish to sit out, SIT OUT. It's that simple.

It's The Global Progressive Socialist Elite Folks.

2010-07-12T18:43:00.011-04:00

NAACP Considers Condemning Tea Party for 'Racism'

Get your heads out of the sand people.

This has nothing to do with race and everything to do with treason. It's the Global Progressive Socialist Elite that is stirring this racist garbage. The Tea Party is far from racist. The Tea Party simply want's to reel in an OUT OF CONTROL Federal Government. It's not just the Left, or the Right, but rather our Federal Government that We The People have allowed to get out of control, and We The People need to put the Fed back where they belong as servants to the states. All U.S. States are sovereign, and all states need to remind the Fed of this. Some are doing just that.

The NAACP is being used by these elitist assholes to make us wanna kill each other, when it's the Global Progressive Socialist Elite that should be hanged. They should be brought before our courts, charged with treason, and if found guilty, punished accordingly. They are also using the media, and many other entities, that cannot resist the power the elite have over them, to stir racial strife. These power mongers are treasonous.

Wake up people before it's too late.

Maybe It's Time To Profile Holder!

2010-07-11T13:08:00.004-04:00

Pile-On: Holder May Slap Arizona With Racial Profiling Suit

But not based on race, rather... Tyranny.

So Rahm Says The U.S. is on Guard?

2010-07-09T14:05:00.003-04:00

Rahm Emanuel: Obama Signed Off on Spy Arrests

Smells like a lie to me.

It looks more to me like the U.S. administration is in cahoots with the communist bastards. Otherwise they would have locked them up for a few years and milked them for all the info they could get from them, rather than sending them home a few days after the arrests.

Do you morons think we're stupid?

The Pastor Did The Right Thing.

2010-07-09T12:12:00.002-04:00

Pastor Yanked From Capitol Over 'Jesus' Prayer

God have mercy on the others... And our nation. In the name of Jesus.

Amen.

Not Bamboozled?

2010-07-09T10:57:00.004-04:00

Obama: GOP trying to "Bamboozle" Voters

I am soooo bamboozled. NOT.

Just Independents?

2010-07-07T22:17:00.004-04:00

Fox News Poll: Independent Voters 'Disappointed' and 'Angry' With Obama Administration

Hey... look around... Quit drinking media koolaid... Talk to normal folks. It's not just the independents.

BTW... is it just me or does this arrogant mutherfucker always have is nose in the air?

Fucking elitist SNOB!

Duh!

2010-07-07T22:16:00.000-04:00

Some Democrats Fear Backlash Over Obama's Handling of Immigration

As they should.

Good Riddance.

2010-07-07T22:15:00.001-04:00

CNN Editor Fired After Tweet on Controversial Lebanese Leader

So Fucking What!

2010-07-07T22:11:00.002-04:00

Arizona Immigration Law Hurts Ties With Mexico, Federal Suit Argues

Like they are all that much help to begun with.

Fuck You Holder!

2010-07-06T19:27:00.008-04:00

Justice Department Files Suit Against Arizona Immigration Law

You're actions, past and present, along with the rest of the Obama adminstration, prove that YOU ALL must be second guessed.

I really don't feel like paying for this charade.

Flawed?

2010-07-06T19:21:00.003-04:00

Former NASA Director Says Muslim Outreach Push 'Deeply Flawed'

Rather... It's balls out stupid. Obama is a fucking moron.

Corruption At It's Finest...

2010-07-02T09:19:00.006-04:00

Top Justice Dept. Official Lied Under Oath About Dismissal of New Black Panther Case, Ex-DOJ Lawyer Says

Dept. Of Justice Drops New Black Panthers Case

The decision to drop this case reeks of corruption on behalf of Loretta King, acting head of the civil rights division, and Steve Rosenbaum, an attorney with the division. And we must not let Eric Holder or Obama completely off the hook either.

Our leadership makes me SICK!

Perhaps the D.O.J. is an acronym for the Department Of Jesters.

Discrimination At It's Finest

2010-07-02T08:09:00.003-04:00

Google Raises Eyebrows With New Gay-Only Employee Benefit

This is straight-up discriminatory!

And We Should Expect...

2010-06-18T11:43:00.007-04:00

EXCLUSIVE: 10 of 17 Afghans Who Deserted U.S. Air Force Base Remain Missing

"Although we are vigilant and need to work toward not allowing this to happen," the official said, this alert should "not necessarily" be described as "a national security threat, more of a 'hey these guys violated our laws and we need to find them.'"

So we should expect, based on past behavior, for the Feds to let them walk freely around the U.S., which is the same way they handle illegals who break our laws when they cross our southern border? It's more of a "hey these guys violated our laws and we need to find them". Right.

WTF? Over?

Other States Should Do The Same.

2010-06-16T06:10:00.002-04:00

Oklahoma Lawmakers Seek Voter Backing to Ban Shariah From Courts

All states should follow Oklahoma's lead. This is evidence that the people of Oklahoma
are thinking ahead.

Game Changer.

2010-06-13T07:08:00.002-04:00

Read this real good...

Pakistan Agency Funds, Influences Taliban in Afghanistan, Report Says

This should be a game changer... and if it isn't our world leaders are more stupid inept, and /or evil than I thought already.

They Should Be Under Fire! Literally.

2010-06-09T22:09:00.005-04:00

Publishing Company Under Fire for Putting Warning Label on Constitution

Fuck'em! I am sick of people stepping on and/or dodging our constitution.

I got your fucking warning label!

2010-06-03T15:38:00.006-04:00

Congresswoman: White Supremacist Groups Behind Arizona Immigration Law

So far it's just hearsay, but even if it was their idea, it does not mean it's a bad one. Regardless of what their track record is. They might be wrong about alot of shit but that does not, in and of itself, mean the Arizona immigration law is a bad one.

It sounds more to me like a typical liberal, thinking they are all creative and shit, by tying the Illegal Immigration issue to a radical group like White Supremacists. It's not that simple lady and will take more than just, so called, liberal creativity to convince the masses otherwise.

Fuck The Flotilla and Those on it!

2010-05-31T18:38:00.006-04:00

“Israel launched this operation in international waters and to a ship flagged white, which is unacceptable under any clause of the international law,” the head of the Turkish Grand National Assembly’s Foreign Affairs Commission, Murat Mercan, said on the Turkish station NTV.

A Ship flagged "White", should mean the ship is in distress. The "Flotilla" and those on board were simply stirring shit, causing trouble, etc... They were NOT in distress.

Israel did what any reasonable nation would have done. They probably should have done more!

I would have put some Hellfire directly into the boat.

No Apologies here.

A Victory, But Not So Sweet.

2010-05-28T13:06:00.004-04:00

Wisconsin Army Veteran Allowed to Keep Flag on Display

Even though you can call this a Victory, it's not so sweet.

It's absolutely ridiculous that we have to even have to battle over a freedom so dear to us as a Nation. In addition, it is a huge waste of tax payer dollars to have to pay our elected leaders to enable the Freedom to Display the American Flag Act of 2005 to protect a simple freedom. If people had some common sense and decency we would not have to go to such extremes.

It's really fucking sad.

Who Cares!

2010-05-27T00:35:00.002-04:00

Lame. We have bigger things to worry about.

You've Got It All Wrong Biden.

2010-05-25T17:23:00.008-04:00

Biden Says Brussels Could Be 'Capital of the Free World'

and I thought he was a Christian. The Bible must have been on the list of things that these people don't read, along with the Health Reform Bill, and the Arizona Immigration laws.

Jerusalem WILL be the 'Capital of the Free World'.

Let's not jump the gun now. The "world" is not free yet. This man is full of blunders. Oh... the folly of our so-called "leaders".

The Lord laughs in derision. :D

Well I Hope They Are Lying.

2010-05-24T16:42:00.004-04:00

I hope they are lying, whoops, I mean mis-speaking, about reading these laws on Health Care reform and Immigration.

BECAUSE THAT'S WHAT WE PAY YOU PEOPLE TO DO!

And I don't care how many pages they are.

Here We Go...

2010-05-23T09:18:00.001-04:00

At West Point, Obama Presses for New World Order to Defeat Al Qaeda

Falling into the NWO trap. Get ready for a wild ride!

This Is Not Good.

2010-05-21T15:10:00.007-04:00

Top Official Says Feds May Not Process Illegals Referred From Arizona

A divided nation will fall. And I think this is exactly what Obama Inc. (OINC) is trying to do to the United States. Things may get really nasty soon.

The people put these folks in power. That means the people TRUST the elected and appointed officials to do the will of the people. This trust is being broken over and over again by this administration. These moves by the federal government are bordering treason. Really bad things would have happened to them back in the seventeen and eighteen hundreds.

All states should coalesce and sue the federal government.

There Can Be Much In A Name.

2010-05-21T07:40:00.007-04:00

Obama's Middle Name Ignites Textbook Battle

"Should history books refer to the president as Barack Obama, Barack H. Obama or Barack Hussein Obama?"

I really don't care what they print. The "H" or "Hussein" is the most irrelevant part of his name. Let the children study this video and study the Hebrew/Aramaic roots of his whole name and put this in the history books.

So was his new name picked to screw with people? Because his name used to be Barry Soetoro. Or was it picked for more nefarious reasons? Either way, it bothers me!

You might need the Hebrew Concordance and the Bible, to help you out on this small study.

We Need An Amendment!

2010-05-20T20:56:00.003-04:00

Political Protest or Harassment?

2010-05-20T18:55:00.011-04:00

Simple. It's Harassment.

Being on the street is one thing, but up in my yard would be another. Using offensive language and such is one thing, but standing on a individual's private property while creating a raucous is ground for action other than dialog. Going to the Bank's HQ to demonstrate would have made more sense also.

If local law enforcement would have failed to run them off after a simple phone call, people might have been shot at if it happened on my property. The owner of the property should sue the SEIU at a bare minimum!

People, have some tact!

How Convenient! Glitch My Ass!

2010-05-20T11:41:00.006-04:00

'Everybody Draw Mohammed' Page Briefly Vanishes Due to Facebook Glitch

Come on?! Do you think we're fucking stupid?

This is CENSORSHIP -- Pure and Simple! I will be telling everyone I know to quit using Facebook. I already do not not use it and removed my self all other social net sites.

It is not couth, and even offensive, to slam any persons god. The Christians among us have been putting up with this crap for years. The Muslims need to get over it, and Facebook and the rest of the media need to GROW A SPINE!

In fact I may disconnect from the net entirely. It used to be a nice tool, but anymore it's just a huge pain in the ass, and being used against the people. If they begin to regulate it, I am definitely out, and this censorship looks to be a non-official start to federal and or corporate regulation.

Fuck you people!

We Need To Clean House!

2010-05-18T15:54:00.004-04:00

Napolitano Admits She Hasn't Read Arizona Immigration Law in 'Detail'

We need to rid ourselves of these incompetent, do nothing, bastards!

America Deserves Better.

2010-05-18T14:49:00.007-04:00

State Department Defends Official Who Expressed Regret to Chinese Over Arizona Law

America deserves better than the spineless trash, such as Posner, that we have running our country. And anyone who defends the fucking slug should be bitch slapped accordingly. I hope it can't get any more pathetic than this. However, something tells me that it can, and will.

The time is approaching to remove the gloves.

Can We Get Some News Coverage On This?

2010-05-18T07:26:00.007-04:00

U.S. reverses stance on treaty to regulate arms trade

CNN? Fox? NBC? CBS? ABC? MSNBC? This is bigger than any oil spill, or the other garbage you all are covering. This is a tyrannical government out of control and deserves much attention.

Get your shit together and DO YOUR JOB!

Major PINHEAD!

2010-05-17T17:55:00.003-04:00

Woody Allen says President Obama should be granted dictatorial powers (seriously)

Haven't you ran past your expiration date, Woody? You're sure talking like an Alzheimer's victim. So if you don't have Alzheimers or your not senile, you are most certainly a dumbass.

We Need More Like This Guy.

2010-05-17T17:43:00.004-04:00

Dale Peterson Gives a ‘Rip’ about Alabama

And it not a shotgun you idiots. It's a rifle. &_&

Gingrich Is A Just Man.

2010-05-16T13:37:00.007-04:00

Gingrich: Democrats Want to Impose 'Secular-Socialist Machine'

Newt Gingrich is calling for the Environmental Protection Agency and Department of Education to be abolished and replaced.

Newt, Your the man! You need to run for President, that is, if we have another election for president in the U.S.

I whole-heartedly agree with Gingrich. Both of these corrupt institutions should be completely dismantled and stripped of all power. They are wickedly corrupt and should be abolished.